Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 14:23:49 GMT
I can vouch for Colebridge having met him at a game or two previously. Can also vouch for yourhereford/StefanHFC. But as nobody has vouched for you, you could be the talented Mr Munsley.
|
|
|
Post by whitefriar on Aug 19, 2015 14:32:34 GMT
It seems the forum hierarchy are happy that they all know who each other and are and are not willing to divulge that information to the majority of signed up members of this forum.
It seems that the forum Admin/mods take the view that most members are happy with that, and since the silent majority of members do not seem unhappy then the hierarchy will not divulge requested information to members not in the loop.
To me this seems no different to the setup of HFC/HUST arrangement.
I find it odd that a similar thread on the last forum about transparency within HFC continued to well over 50 pages, many posters of whom were part of this forum setup.
At risk of turning this into an on-line slag fest, I'll drop the subject for now since I have nothing more to add.
Personally, I think it sends the wrong message out but everyone is entitled to their views. Time to stop posting from me for now. Good luck with the forum. Have a thick skin as I'm sure you will get a few PITA's (myself included)
|
|
|
Post by BullRush on Aug 19, 2015 14:37:36 GMT
I can vouch for Colebridge having met him at a game or two previously. Can also vouch for yourhereford/StefanHFC. But as nobody has vouched for you, you could be the talented Mr Munsley. I am indeed.
|
|
|
Post by bullish on Aug 19, 2015 14:38:40 GMT
It seems the forum hierarchy are happy that they all know who each other and are and are not willing to divulge that information to the majority of signed up members of this forum. It seems that the forum Admin/mods take the view that most members are happy with that, and since the silent majority of members do not seem unhappy then the hierarchy will not divulge requested information to members not in the loop. To me this seems no different to the setup of HFC/HUST arrangement. I find it odd that a similar thread on the last forum about transparency within HFC continued to well over 50 pages, many posters of whom were part of this forum setup. At risk of turning this into an on-line slag fest, I'll drop the subject for now since I have nothing more to add. Personally, I think it sends the wrong message out but everyone is entitled to their views. Time to stop posting from me for now. Good luck with the forum. Have a thick skin as I'm sure you will get a few PITA's (myself included) check the forum vision thread: 'the community make the rules'.
|
|
Percy
Senior Member
Posts: 1,425
|
Post by Percy on Aug 19, 2015 14:39:18 GMT
THREAD "CLOSED"
|
|
|
Post by Villier on Aug 19, 2015 14:42:02 GMT
It seems the forum hierarchy are happy that they all know who each other and are and are not willing to divulge that information to the majority of signed up members of this forum. It seems that the forum Admin/mods take the view that most members are happy with that, and since the silent majority of members do not seem unhappy then the hierarchy will not divulge requested information to members not in the loop. To me this seems no different to the setup of HFC/HUST arrangement. I find it odd that a similar thread on the last forum about transparency within HFC continued to well over 50 pages, many posters of whom were part of this forum setup. At risk of turning this into an on-line slag fest, I'll drop the subject for now since I have nothing more to add. Personally, I think it sends the wrong message out but everyone is entitled to their views. Time to stop posting from me for now. Good luck with the forum. Have a thick skin as I'm sure you will get a few PITA's (myself included) One is a hugely valued community asset with 90 years of history, sitting on land worth millions of quid. The other is an internet forum. Jaysus.
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Aug 19, 2015 14:49:44 GMT
The difference here is that most seem to know these admin whereas on the old forum no-one apart from admin knew anything or so he/she thought.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:35:45 GMT
So who is Admin?
|
|
jc
Junior Member
Having a small psychotic episode - will be back yesterday, maybe!
Posts: 482
|
Post by jc on Aug 19, 2015 16:40:05 GMT
So who is Admin? He is the guy whom set up this forum when BB went tits, so we could continue unhindered with our thoughts and suggestions in peace and harmony.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:44:22 GMT
So who is Admin? He is the guy whom set up this forum when BB went tits, so we could continue unhindered with our thoughts and suggestions in peace and harmony. So Admin could be Malcolm Lane
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:46:25 GMT
Admin is "Freetown Kudos" off the old forum, the guy who ran the "Save Edgar Street" blog during the Agomdale nightmare.
|
|
|
Post by ledburybull on Aug 19, 2015 16:49:06 GMT
oh my god i have just realised why i have never posted on a forum before some on here are so far up there own behinds i will post on here if i want and i do not think the whole world has to know who i am so that i can be stalked by who ever i think the saying is get an life
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:49:48 GMT
Admin is "Freetown Kudos" off the old forum, the guy who ran the "Save Edgar Street" blog during the Agomdale nightmare. So Admin could be Martin Watson?
|
|
|
Post by nobby on Aug 19, 2015 16:50:46 GMT
It seems the forum hierarchy are happy that they all know who each other and are and are not willing to divulge that information to the majority of signed up members of this forum. It seems that the forum Admin/mods take the view that most members are happy with that, and since the silent majority of members do not seem unhappy then the hierarchy will not divulge requested information to members not in the loop. To me this seems no different to the setup of HFC/HUST arrangement. I find it odd that a similar thread on the last forum about transparency within HFC continued to well over 50 pages, many posters of whom were part of this forum setup. At risk of turning this into an on-line slag fest, I'll drop the subject for now since I have nothing more to add. Personally, I think it sends the wrong message out but everyone is entitled to their views. Time to stop posting from me for now. Good luck with the forum. Have a thick skin as I'm sure you will get a few PITA's (myself included) I suspect I've been caught in the net here as no one would write such trollope and be serious. But anyway...this is a forum...free, no income paid to join, no need for registration at companies and no jurdiction under company law and so on. Using correct names will bring complaints of slander and the like... ok I'm boring myself now so I'll stop. Just so you know. ..for clarity, I'm Jonny Dangerous's brother from another mother and a different father....if that helps a little
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:55:03 GMT
Admin is "Freetown Kudos" off the old forum, the guy who ran the "Save Edgar Street" blog during the Agomdale nightmare. So Admin could be Martin Watson? Is there a problem with Martin Watson being Admin?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:55:39 GMT
Not from me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:56:08 GMT
Admin is "Freetown Kudos" off the old forum, the guy who ran the "Save Edgar Street" blog during the Agomdale nightmare. So Admin could be Martin Watson? You may remember he was also the fella who kindly offered to work on the Articles of the Association but whose help was turned down by HUST/HFC after being ignored for a long time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:57:03 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:57:59 GMT
So Admin could be Martin Watson? You may remember he was also the fella who kindly offered to work on the Articles of the Association but whose help was turned down by HUST/HFC after being ignored for a long time. So Admin could be Andy Munsley?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 16:59:58 GMT
I get the impression that you think you are being witty, but also, you secretly know you don't have a clue what's going on, or what you are on about. Right?
|
|