|
|
Post by eggchaserbull on Aug 27, 2015 9:50:40 GMT
Na na na na, hey hey, goodbye Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey, goodbye Steam - Na Na Hey Hey (Kiss Him Goodbye) "Goodbye" often supplanted by "Dudley Tyler", I think?
Nah (do you see what I did there?), I'm thinking Na na na na nana, Na na na na nana
Mary Hopkins - Those Were The Days
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 9:55:47 GMT
Hopkin.
You'll never be a proper writer.
|
|
|
|
Post by BullRush on Aug 27, 2015 9:58:47 GMT
"Na Na Na Nah, Na Na Na Nah, Hey, hey, hey Pablo Haysham" has quite a nice ring to it.
Decent.
|
|
|
|
Post by nobby on Aug 27, 2015 10:21:55 GMT
Well I’m female, I’ve got breasts and I don’t need a load of men who’ve never actually been a woman to tell me what to be offended by. This thread is typical of the left-wing right-on PC Guardian-reading nonsense we all have to put up with each day. Why shouldn’t we all be free to say what we want whenever we want without the PC brigade coming steaming in and telling us what we can and can’t say? As the old saying goes, “I don’t agree with what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it”. Im liking this. I don't think the PC brigade will be marching in any time though  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 10:40:54 GMT
Mary Hopkins? Having read the last few pages of this abomination of a thread I think Katie Hopkins would be more appropriate.
|
|
jc
Junior Member
Having a small psychotic episode - will be back yesterday, maybe!
Posts: 482
|
Post by jc on Aug 27, 2015 10:48:59 GMT
Katie Hopkins as goalie?
It would sure as hell frighten their strikers as well as our defenders!
|
|
jc
Junior Member
Having a small psychotic episode - will be back yesterday, maybe!
Posts: 482
|
Post by jc on Aug 27, 2015 12:30:10 GMT
sanmartino "deleted member" - why? It seems, from the logs, he decided to deleted his posts and then completely deleted his profile of his own accord. I am guessing the heated debate on his joke on this thread got to him and he decided to remove himself. As we have said before, all are welcome to post and if they so choose to leave as well, however, wilful, deliberate personal insults to another poster will sadly incur a moderators intervention, so please respect others freedom to say what they want and to have other opinions to your own, that way we can all have our say, without it going too far. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 12:31:54 GMT
Thanks.
I shall miss him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thank You Archie Phillips on Aug 27, 2015 15:24:10 GMT
I was wondering abt SM too.
Did he jump or was he "pushed", in moderation of course.
I liked his forthright honesty fwiw, not scared to call a spade a spade.
|
|
jc
Junior Member
Having a small psychotic episode - will be back yesterday, maybe!
Posts: 482
|
Post by jc on Aug 27, 2015 15:26:49 GMT
He removed himself, the first I knew about it was wainwrongs post
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 10:19:48 GMT
Well I’m female, I’ve got breasts and I don’t need a load of men who’ve never actually been a woman to tell me what to be offended by. This thread is typical of the left-wing right-on PC Guardian-reading nonsense we all have to put up with each day. Why shouldn’t we all be free to say what we want whenever we want without the PC brigade coming steaming in and telling us what we can and can’t say? As the old saying goes, “I don’t agree with what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it”. See Guardian newspaper 29 August 2015 review section 'Trigger Warning'-Mick Hume review,enjoy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 15:21:20 GMT
Well I’m female, I’ve got breasts and I don’t need a load of men who’ve never actually been a woman to tell me what to be offended by. This thread is typical of the left-wing right-on PC Guardian-reading nonsense we all have to put up with each day. Why shouldn’t we all be free to say what we want whenever we want without the PC brigade coming steaming in and telling us what we can and can’t say? As the old saying goes, “I don’t agree with what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it”. Hooray! "Left-wing right-on PC Guardian-reading nonsense." I like the general thrust of your comment. For me it kind of balances out some of the other stuff that is available to read on here. I will now put on my tin hat and await the firestorm that is likely to come in my direction. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 21:18:37 GMT
Well I’m female, I’ve got breasts and I don’t need a load of men who’ve never actually been a woman to tell me what to be offended by. This thread is typical of the left-wing right-on PC Guardian-reading nonsense we all have to put up with each day. Why shouldn’t we all be free to say what we want whenever we want without the PC brigade coming steaming in and telling us what we can and can’t say? As the old saying goes, “I don’t agree with what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it”. See Guardian newspaper 29 August 2015 review section 'Trigger Warning'-Mick Hume review,enjoy. Should one say "yes, I enjoyed that" or "God, that's offensive."? Your call. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 21:32:26 GMT
Whose call?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 21:45:58 GMT
On the basis that you brought it (the book) to my (and others) attention and said "enjoy," yours I guess.
But hey, no big deal.
Just trying to establish the direction from which you were coming on this particular topic is all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 0:00:12 GMT
On the basis that you brought it (the book) to my (and others) attention and said "enjoy," yours I guess. But hey, no big deal. Just trying to establish the direction from which you were coming on this particular topic is all. Ok.Enjoy-as in, it(the review) touches quite concisely on freedom of speech and related historical,philosophical thinking/ideas relevant to this thread-you may wish to read it and find it interesting.SarahJ asks, why can we not say what we want, whenever we want?She will defend our right to do this.Whether she finds the singing of' get your tits out for the lads'defensible only SarahJ can say.Me I don't.Hopefully the visiting physio thought, what a load of sad tossers. |
|
|
|
Post by Rusty Trombone on Sept 2, 2015 0:01:43 GMT
The big question is this, are they worth getting out?
|
|
|
|
Post by bazbodenham on Sept 2, 2015 6:29:55 GMT
Pathetic comment .
|
|
|
|
Post by Fownhope Bull on Sept 2, 2015 7:30:14 GMT
Well I’m female, I’ve got breasts and I don’t need a load of men who’ve never actually been a woman to tell me what to be offended by. This thread is typical of the left-wing right-on PC Guardian-reading nonsense we all have to put up with each day. Why shouldn’t we all be free to say what we want whenever we want without the PC brigade coming steaming in and telling us what we can and can’t say? As the old saying goes, “I don’t agree with what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it”. Only Alvin would have written this - although it's even a bit obvious for him. Maybe an Alvin wannabe. Try being a little less clichéd next time. |
|
