|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 8:08:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 8:09:11 GMT
When you read the abuse of politicians on this forum its amazing that I got banned for calling the Sturgeon woman a hard-faced cow. I think it depends if you have rattled a member of admin. Would you call a man a cow?
|
|
|
Post by glawsterwhite on Jun 24, 2019 8:29:38 GMT
Well Caligula the point I was trying to make was that having muppets like trump and Johnson leading the u.s. and. U.k. hardly helps in our defence of democracy and in our attempts to foist it upon non-western nations. ...
|
|
|
Post by lazarus on Jun 24, 2019 8:31:52 GMT
When you read the abuse of politicians on this forum its amazing that I got banned for calling the Sturgeon woman a hard-faced cow. I think it depends if you have rattled a member of admin. Would you call a man a cow? No because the gender would be wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Saul Goodman on Jun 24, 2019 8:32:18 GMT
Well Caligula the point I was trying to make was that having muppets like trump and Johnson leading the u.s. and. U.k. hardly helps in our defence of democracy and in our attempts to foist it upon non-western nations. ... I know. And I was agreeing with you. Perhaps I could have made that more clear. 🙂
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 9:50:44 GMT
Would you call a man a cow? No because the gender would be wrong. No further questions.
|
|
FASH
Senior Member
Posts: 2,157
|
Post by FASH on Jun 24, 2019 10:14:26 GMT
Would you call a man a cow? No because the gender would be wrong. Watch out, you might get banned for assuming Sturgeon's gender. According to some nutters you don't have to anything in your lunchbox to be called a man, nowadays. Her's bovine.
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 10:18:36 GMT
No because the gender would be wrong. Watch out, you might get banned for assuming Sturgeon's gender. According to some nutters you don't have to anything in your lunchbox to be called a man, nowadays. Her's bovine. As per usual
|
|
FASH
Senior Member
Posts: 2,157
|
Post by FASH on Jun 24, 2019 10:23:48 GMT
I didn't address any "point". I made a post to let him/her/they know that (according to some) it's no longer acceptable to assume someone's gender.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2019 10:29:47 GMT
It's seems that Boris was on top last Thursday night?
Does that help with sorting out his gender?
|
|
FASH
Senior Member
Posts: 2,157
|
Post by FASH on Jun 24, 2019 10:35:04 GMT
I know who they are. I haven’t heard the tape. It appears that Johnson has instructed members of my profession, no doubt at huge expense, to ensure that it does not enter the public domain. You might ask why he is so terribly keen that it doesn’t. It is not evidence in any criminal proceedings as it appears that no complaint has been made. The well reported words “get off me” suggest that one should be, but that is a matter for the current Johnson partner. I make no judgment on his marital arrangements. It is worthy of note that the police received three separate calls from different individuals about the screaming coming from the address. Which speaks volumes (sic) What should be of concern is the concerted effort by elements of the press to shoot the messengers. I would hope that it does not put off well meaning members of the public in similar positions, whether or not the conduct they’re reporting is that of a potential prime minister of this country. Should they have gone to the press with this? Tricky call- but on balance there is a very strong public interest argument. And bluntly the Guardian would be the only publication who could have been trusted not to kill the story. A sad indictment of this country. Distraction, distraction, distraction.... The Guardian is utter, utter filth. www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/06/22/guar-j22.html
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 10:39:45 GMT
I didn't address any "point". I made a post to let him/her/they know that (according to some) it's no longer acceptable to assume someone's gender.
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 10:43:52 GMT
I know who they are. I haven’t heard the tape. It appears that Johnson has instructed members of my profession, no doubt at huge expense, to ensure that it does not enter the public domain. You might ask why he is so terribly keen that it doesn’t. It is not evidence in any criminal proceedings as it appears that no complaint has been made. The well reported words “get off me” suggest that one should be, but that is a matter for the current Johnson partner. I make no judgment on his marital arrangements. It is worthy of note that the police received three separate calls from different individuals about the screaming coming from the address. Which speaks volumes (sic) What should be of concern is the concerted effort by elements of the press to shoot the messengers. I would hope that it does not put off well meaning members of the public in similar positions, whether or not the conduct they’re reporting is that of a potential prime minister of this country. Should they have gone to the press with this? Tricky call- but on balance there is a very strong public interest argument. And bluntly the Guardian would be the only publication who could have been trusted not to kill the story. A sad indictment of this country. Distraction, distraction, distraction.... The Guardian is utter, utter filth. www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/06/22/guar-j22.htmlGot any views on the plethora of right wing rags, or does that not suit your agenda?
|
|
FASH
Senior Member
Posts: 2,157
|
Post by FASH on Jun 24, 2019 10:54:06 GMT
Yeah, much like the Guardian they are filth.
But in my view the Guardian is particularly dangerous as the left tend to actually believe what's written in there and put it on a pedestal as a publication that can be trusted.
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 10:55:49 GMT
Yeah, much like the Guardian they are filth. But in my view the Guardian is particularly dangerous as the left tend to actually believe what's written in there and put it on a pedestal as a publication that can be trusted.
|
|
FASH
Senior Member
Posts: 2,157
|
Post by FASH on Jun 24, 2019 10:58:13 GMT
Christ, moving pictures, how very technical. Very clever.
|
|
FASH
Senior Member
Posts: 2,157
|
Post by FASH on Jun 24, 2019 11:20:34 GMT
I think we need to bring back national service. Youngsters seem to have too much time on their hands which they don't seem to be using for productive means.
|
|
|
Post by Incognito on Jun 24, 2019 14:03:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Palms Halt on Jun 24, 2019 14:17:01 GMT
Christ, moving pictures, how very technical. Very clever.
|
|
|
Post by glawsterwhite on Jun 24, 2019 17:14:19 GMT
Tell you something vayne I’ve read the guardian from time to time and have to say compared to the likes of the mail, express etc it’s positively Mensa like !
|
|