|
|
Post by Fireman Sam on Sept 14, 2015 9:18:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by bullish on Sept 14, 2015 9:33:00 GMT
they can't co-opt any more. no more than one third of the HUST board can be co-opted directors according to the constitution. um. having said that it looks like they currently have 2 co-opted board members out of five? www.hufctrust.co.uk/board-members/i guess it all depends on how many board members HUST actually has at present. it would be good to have a clear understanding of who is still on the HUST board, who has resigned, who has stood down, and who is intending to stand down at the AGM. the available information is far from clear. |
|
|
|
Post by Fireman Sam on Sept 14, 2015 9:46:42 GMT
they can't co-opt any more. no more than one third of the HUST board can be co-opted directors according to the constitution. um. having said that it looks like they currently have 2 co-opted board members out of five? www.hufctrust.co.uk/board-members/i guess it all depends on how many board members HUST actually has at present. it would be good to have a clear understanding of who is still on the HUST board, who has resigned, who has stood down, and who is intending to stand down at the AGM. the available information is far from clear. Cheers for the Bullsized. I guess that raises another question as to what happens to Mike Langford and his HFC board position then? If he has had to stand down because his term had come to an end and was looking for re-election they can't now co-opt him back on as they have to many co-opted members already to do that? |
|
|
|
Post by bullish on Sept 14, 2015 9:55:17 GMT
they can't co-opt any more. no more than one third of the HUST board can be co-opted directors according to the constitution. um. having said that it looks like they currently have 2 co-opted board members out of five? www.hufctrust.co.uk/board-members/i guess it all depends on how many board members HUST actually has at present. it would be good to have a clear understanding of who is still on the HUST board, who has resigned, who has stood down, and who is intending to stand down at the AGM. the available information is far from clear. Cheers for the Bullsized. I guess that raises another question as to what happens to Mike Langford and his HFC board position then? If he has had to stand down because his term had come to an end and was looking for re-election they can't now co-opt him back on as they have to many co-opted members already to do that? i'm not really sure sam. i think the first thing we need to know is how many people are actually on the HUST board now and who they are. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2015 10:03:07 GMT
So when can we expect the new HUST board to be up and running. Also this delay has no bearing on the current HUST elected board as they have another year to run after this one don't they? (Sorry if I got that wrong)
|
|
|
|
Post by bullish on Sept 14, 2015 10:11:14 GMT
So when can we expect the new HUST board to be up and running. Also this delay has no bearing on the current HUST elected board as they have another year to run after this one don't they? (Sorry if I got that wrong) no. there is a requirement for the longest serving half of elected board members to resign at the AGM. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2015 10:12:29 GMT
So when can we expect the new HUST board to be up and running. Also this delay has no bearing on the current HUST elected board as they have another year to run after this one don't they? (Sorry if I got that wrong) no. there is a requirement for the longest serving half of elected board members to resign at the AGM. But don't they do a two year term? Yet an AGM is annual. |
|
|
|
Post by bullish on Sept 14, 2015 10:24:40 GMT
no. there is a requirement for the longest serving half of elected board members to resign at the AGM. But don't they do a two year term? Yet an AGM is annual. yes they will 'normally' serve for two years according to the constitution. but there is also a requirement for the longest serving half of elected directors to resign each year. this would not 'normally' prevent anybody serving two years as far as i can work out.... at this AGM for example the longest serving would probably be the chair and vice chair. both of whom have already served two years. that's how i understand it anyway. other opinions are probably available...... |
|
|
|
Post by onlooker on Sept 14, 2015 10:30:51 GMT
There are no set procedures for HUST appointments to the board of Hereford FC Ltd (another thing that needs to be resolved.) The present HUST board appear to be making the appointments/nominations under a clause giving them authority "to do anything else not specifically covered in the constitution" (or some similar wording.) Thus they need not restrict their nomination to a HUST board member or even a HUST member, although that would not go down too well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2015 10:37:23 GMT
But don't they do a two year term? Yet an AGM is annual. yes they will 'normally' serve for two years according to the constitution. but there is also a requirement for the longest serving half of elected directors to resign each year. this would not 'normally' prevent anybody serving two years as far as i can work out.... at this AGM for example the longest serving would probably be the chair and vice chair. both of whom have already served two years. that's how i understand it anyway. other opinions are probably available...... Cheers It's such a shame it's so complicated. I can't see why The Chair and Vice can't stay on. They have done so much (with others) to get HUST and then HFC up and running. So just for clarification the Chair and Vice Chair of HUST automatically get a seat on the HFC board? |
|
|
|
Post by tommytainant on Sept 14, 2015 10:44:26 GMT
If the board are not quorate then they are not allowed to do anything other than get the board up to strength.
Step one will be to adopt an election policy that is fit for purpose. The current one isnt.
I suspect that they will take the standard supporters direct policy on board.
Then they will have to run the election to that policy.
This would mean asking candidates to resubmit nominations and also soliciting new nominations.
This has to be done 8 week before the meeting. So as you can see there wont be a new board in the near future.
Of course with the new election being run properly there may be more people willing to take part and there should be an election.
But you all need to renew your membership if you want a voice.
The current shambles must raise question marks over Messrs Williams and Watson representing HIUST on the HFC board. Do they have the sklls to do so ?
|
|
|
|
Post by tommytainant on Sept 14, 2015 10:45:44 GMT
yes they will 'normally' serve for two years according to the constitution. but there is also a requirement for the longest serving half of elected directors to resign each year. this would not 'normally' prevent anybody serving two years as far as i can work out.... at this AGM for example the longest serving would probably be the chair and vice chair. both of whom have already served two years. that's how i understand it anyway. other opinions are probably available...... Cheers It's such a shame it's so complicated. I can't see why The Chair and Vice can't stay on. They have done so much (with others) to get HUST and then HFC up and running. So just for clarification the Chair and Vice Chair of HUST automatically get a seat on the HFC board? No. That is the current situation but there are no rules or policies to enforce this. |
|
|
|
Post by eggchaserbull on Sept 14, 2015 16:00:35 GMT
But would we believe him? I think this raises a serious point. If anyone stepped up and said "Fair cop. I'm responsible for Andy Munsley, all the articles posted on Bulls News in his name and the erratic moderation, and ultimately the closure, of Bulls Banter", would anyone believe them? You will be receiving a letter, from my solicitor, in due course. I will not be accused of raising serious points. Whatever next. |
|
|
|
Post by colebridgebull on Sept 14, 2015 16:22:38 GMT
A NWNF TLL no less
|
|
|
|
Post by eggchaserbull on Sept 14, 2015 16:38:15 GMT
Can you pay less than NWNF?
If so, are you available to act for me, colebridgebull?
|
|
|
|
Post by colebridgebull on Sept 14, 2015 17:38:48 GMT
I'm an AGL sadly
|
|
