Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2019 12:12:37 GMT
It has never entered the public domain.
If a debate, started on Bulls News by quoting Green, is to be held about the merits of Beadle returning, it seems to me to be a very necessary piece in the jig-saw.
(At least, when you know why it was - like I do....)
|
|
|
|
Post by Peroni on Dec 30, 2019 12:19:20 GMT
thats another gin wasted because of you
|
|
|
|
Post by Jess from Greendale on Dec 30, 2019 12:41:27 GMT
thats another gin wasted because of you Gin? GIN?? Oh ffs. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2019 12:58:44 GMT
who has told us the real beadle exit reason
IIRC it's slipped out on here three times in the last eight months or so.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peroni on Dec 30, 2019 13:02:52 GMT
who has told us the real beadle exit reasonIIRC it's slipped out on here three times in the last eight months or so. oh  apologies i obviously slipped out 3 (three) times this year and missed out on ww's pronouncements must read more of his posts anyone willing to point me in the direction ?
|
|
242460
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by 242460 on Dec 30, 2019 13:03:34 GMT
Was the post/posts left on or deleted?
|
|
|
|
Post by organic on Dec 30, 2019 13:03:44 GMT
Please remind us.
|
|
|
|
Post by indefatigabull on Dec 30, 2019 14:00:33 GMT
Was it Beadle that took up with Turner's daughter?
|
|
|
|
Post by Peroni on Dec 30, 2019 14:11:57 GMT
Was it Beadle that took up with Turner's daughter? think your confusing the fact that marco was his SIL
don't know if I allowed to say that
anyway, i'm sure whoever wont mind posting the real answer once again, so we can all have the jigsaw piece to have a proper debate
|
|
|
|
Post by shabbaranks on Dec 30, 2019 15:06:05 GMT
We can’t keep changing managers all the time we will never get a decent set up doing that. Not to mention the cost. If it’s still sh!t this time next year, then might be the time to look at it. I can't remember your stance on Richards, but generally on here he got pelters (deservedly) from day one, and did nothing to disprove the fact that everyone knew he was #@&t. Well it seems blatant double standards that you among others don't apply those standards of judgement to Slade who is doing WORSE than Richards. People's primary defence being his number of games managed, this 'footballing man' rubbish and a need for continuity. Well why continuity for Slade but not for Richards? And no one on here yet has answered my original post... which leads me to believe we ALL know Slade's a bull#@&t merchant. Imagine waiting till this time next year just to be in this position again. For me it'd be just as stupid as keeping Richards during the summer was. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2019 15:12:48 GMT
We can’t keep changing managers all the time we will never get a decent set up doing that. Not to mention the cost. If it’s still sh!t this time next year, then might be the time to look at it. I can't remember your stance on Richards, but generally on here he got pelters (deservedly) from day one, and did nothing to disprove the fact that everyone knew he was #@&t. Well it seems blatant double standards that you among others don't apply those standards of judgement to Slade who is doing WORSE than Richards. People's primary defence being his number of games managed, this 'footballing man' rubbish and a need for continuity. Well why continuity for Slade but not for Richards? And no one on here yet has answered my original post... which leads me to believe we ALL know Slade's a bull#@&t merchant. Imagine waiting till this time next year just to be in this position again. For me it'd be just as stupid as keeping Richards during the summer was. You need to know the reason why Slade hasn't been sacked (like I do....) |
|
|
|
Post by MAXBULL on Dec 30, 2019 16:51:59 GMT
We can’t keep changing managers all the time we will never get a decent set up doing that. Not to mention the cost. If it’s still sh!t this time next year, then might be the time to look at it. I can't remember your stance on Richards, but generally on here he got pelters (deservedly) from day one, and did nothing to disprove the fact that everyone knew he was #@&t. Well it seems blatant double standards that you among others don't apply those standards of judgement to Slade who is doing WORSE than Richards. People's primary defence being his number of games managed, this 'footballing man' rubbish and a need for continuity. Well why continuity for Slade but not for Richards? And no one on here yet has answered my original post... which leads me to believe we ALL know Slade's a bull#@&t merchant. Imagine waiting till this time next year just to be in this position again. For me it'd be just as stupid as keeping Richards during the summer was. I didn’t really have a problem with Richards it was Harris who was the problem. Richards didn’t stand a chance and was only there to take the rap. Not his fault. Under a proper manager I imagine Richards could do a reasonable job. |
|
jamesb
Junior Member
Posts: 138
|
Post by jamesb on Dec 31, 2019 11:46:08 GMT
If anybody on here knows why Beadle was sacked please just directly answer this post because I still don't have a clue and I am fed up of all the vague 'I know, you know' comments, just say it straight out !
Harris and Richards have driven the club to the brink once more and should have gone much sooner than they did.
Slade, the record is terrible, but his problem is the mess he was left. He has players on the books that need to go, some of whom are contracted which makes it difficult when all the money has been spent by the previous pair. So it is difficult to judge Slade at the moment because whatever team we put out is not going to be good.
We need a total clear out and start over from scratch in the summer but whether that is possible in this league when all your money has gone ? I'm not so sure.
What I do know is that we are in a much worse state than that in which Beadle left us, and that is a sad state of affairs.
Finally, what of all the good blokes that got us to this level and where never given a chance to show their worth, just ruthlessly culled by Harris and Richards, they were better than the current dire crop. I will say thanks to all of these guys and sorry that we treated you so badly in return.
|
|
|
|
Post by Barney still in B-Block on Dec 31, 2019 13:56:22 GMT
If anybody on here knows why Beadle was sacked please just directly answer this post because I still don't have a clue and I am fed up of all the vague 'I know, you know' comments, just say it straight out !Harris and Richards have driven the club to the brink once more and should have gone much sooner than they did. Slade, the record is terrible, but his problem is the mess he was left. He has players on the books that need to go, some of whom are contracted which makes it difficult when all the money has been spent by the previous pair. So it is difficult to judge Slade at the moment because whatever team we put out is not going to be good. We need a total clear out and start over from scratch in the summer but whether that is possible in this league when all your money has gone ? I'm not so sure. What I do know is that we are in a much worse state than that in which Beadle left us, and that is a sad state of affairs. Finally, what of all the good blokes that got us to this level and where never given a chance to show their worth, just ruthlessly culled by Harris and Richards, they were better than the current dire crop. I will say thanks to all of these guys and sorry that we treated you so badly in return.
'Uncouth' is the word I hear most in relation to PB being dismissed.
Certainly couldn't be justified on football reasons. Particularly after noting the budget made available to his successors.
|
|
sisyphus
Senior Member
Taking no chances.....
Posts: 651
|
Post by sisyphus on Jan 1, 2020 9:50:41 GMT
It was common knowledge that PB ‘liked a pint’.
There are licensed premises within ES.
Some of the denizens in the shadows are complete arseholes.
PB is a straight talker.
Some of the arseholes constantly spout bollox.
Not a good mix.
|
|
sisyphus
Senior Member
Taking no chances.....
Posts: 651
|
Post by sisyphus on Jan 1, 2020 9:52:06 GMT
Ps Happy New Year to all.
|
|
|
|
Post by nailswortholdbull on Jan 1, 2020 12:08:27 GMT
Pete's problem seems to have been that he was a proper "football man", unlike the arse licking, BS spouting, individual who succeeded him. All this speculation, and it is nothing more than that, about why PB left the club, is a waste of time. The board does not own up to any mistakes, misjudgements, or cockups; why expect them to start now?
|
|
pigpen
Junior Member
Posts: 188 
|
Post by pigpen on Jan 2, 2020 19:55:08 GMT
Enter Big Dave..............
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeunderpenyard on Jan 2, 2020 20:03:45 GMT
Gone to Morecambe.
|
|
|
|
Post by sparkybull on Jan 2, 2020 23:11:08 GMT
off the topic of conversation but in regards to player recruitment the vast majority are in agreeance that they believe that a number of the current squad that was bought in by the previous management arnt good enough and yet slade has come out and said the budget is tight? I’d ask the question in that if slade was as much as a higher level manager that he once was surely he is capable of developing the lesser players to a slightly better performance than what some are currently showing, but yet it’s easy to say there not his players and that it once again requires a start again method?
So question: What is it fans look for in players if slade is going to recruit, would you be happy to see unproven but hungry players from lower levels eager for a chance too prove on lesser money or players from higher level that arnt getting games that know the level also?
Reason I ask is because putting my neck on the chopping block I’ve tried to contact slade personally too get involved in the recruitment side and had the chance of signing a league 2 striker from not a million miles away that won the conference with a former club that also wasn’t I million miles away but was ignored and not replied?
|
|
